It may appear I’m being sensational with the Obama/Baphomet photo as my featured image, but my question remains a good one. There was much confusion in conspiracy land as to why most main stream media outlets ran with the ‘Obama Horn’ photo as their thumbnail to advertise his ISIS strategy speech.
Message boards and YouTube videos claimed the photo was “photo shopped”, and some even claimed a green screen was used because the background didn’t appear to match up with the video. After further analysis, the photo was indeed taken from the President’s speech on 9/10. In order to get the “horns” into view behind his head, the shot from the cameraman must have a came in at a very low angle.
The question still remains…why did main stream news outlets like the New York Times choose to use this photo that appears to show “horns” behind Obama’s head?
I don’t have answer, but I can offer a few theories.
1. The horns are a complete coincidence.
2. There are those in power at main stream news outlets whom no longer care for Obama and want to paint him in a bad light. They knew the photo would reinforce the Christian belief that he is the Anti-Christ of Revelations, and put a splinter in the mind of those who don’t believe.
3. The photo is not coincidence, and is manifestation of who really controls Obama, akin to how vampires have no reflection.
If I was a betting man I would put my money on number 2. I believe Obama is just as human as the rest of us, and he’s fallen out of favor with the media, and his allies on the left. There isn’t much of a difference in the war machine between Bush and Obama. Bush took his marching orders to prosecute the war overtly, where Obama’s administration has been more covert through the use of drone strikes, fomenting revolution, and funding “rebels” to topple targeted governments.
Let’s not forget there was a time when we were treated with numerous Obama halo photos. He was once considered our savior. The man who would bring America back from the brink, and rescue us from the Bush years.
I don’t believe Obama is the anti-christ, nor do I believe he could have been our savior. Whomever goes against the plans of the military industrial complex will soon find themselves dead. President Kennedy did this, and on the occult significant day of 11/22 he was dispatched from our world.
What I find most concerning about President Obama’s speech is his plans to fund and support the opposition in Syria, whom are often referred to as the Free Syrian Army. Obama’s teleprompter told us he would not hesitate to bomb targets in Syria, and also added:
“It is America that has rallied the world against Russian aggression and in support of the Ukrainian people’s right to determine their own destiny.”
Funding rebels to take down Assad?
I thought this speech was about ISIS? Or is it ISIL? Or is it al-Qaeda?
Oh right. You’re using ISIS an excuse to find a way to bomb Syria, and take Assad down! Ahhh I get it now. I’m sorry, I really thought it was about ISIS (heavy sarcasm implied)
ISIS is being used as a back door way of taking down Assad in Syria. The administration had hoped to use the August 2013 chemical attack in Syria as an excuse to provide air support to the “rebels” on the ground. Obama and specifically John Kerry claimed it was Assad who ordered the attack on his own people, but the evidence was not conclusive to authorize an attack without a backlash. Vlad Putin stepped in to resolve the situation and prevent the attack. Assad willingly gave up his chemical stockpile.
How do you bomb Syria without an excuse, well you create one in ISIS.
This time Russia won’t be able to step in to resolve the problem diplomatically. They have been demonized over the Ukrainian conflict, and have been blamed for the downing of MH17 with very little evidence.
The path we are following will one day lead to open conflict between NATO and Russia.